Is brain learning weaker than Artificial Intelligence?

Is brain learning weaker than Artificial Intelligence?

Although the brain’s architecture is very shallow, brain-inspired artificial neural networks’ learning capabilities can outperform deep learning AI

Traditionally, artificial intelligence stems from human brain dynamics. However, brain learning is restricted in a number of significant aspects compared to deep learning (DL).  

First, efficient DL wiring structures (architectures) consist of many tens of feedforward (consecutive) layers, whereas brain dynamics consist of only a few feedforward layers.

Second, DL architectures typically consist of many consecutive filter layers, which are essential to identify one of the input classes. If the input is a car, for example, the first filter identifies wheels, the second one identifies doors, the third one lights and after many additional filters it becomes clear that the input object is, indeed, a car.

Conversely, brain dynamics contain just a single filter located close to the retina. The last necessary component is the mathematical complex DL training procedure, which is evidently far beyond biological realisation.

Can the brain, with its limited realisation of precise mathematical operations, compete with advanced artificial intelligence systems implemented on fast and parallel computers?

From our daily experience, we know that for many tasks the answer is yes! Why is this and, given this affirmative answer, can one build a new type of efficient artificial intelligence inspired by the brain? Researchers from Bar-Ilan University in Israel have solved this puzzle.

See also: Teaching photonic chips to learn

efficient learning

Research lead Professor Ido Kanter, of Bar-Ilan’s Department of Physics and Gonda (Goldschmied) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, said: “We’ve shown that efficient learning on an artificial tree architecture, where each weight has a single route to an output unit, can achieve better classification success rates than previously achieved by DL architectures consisting of more layers and filters.

“This finding paves the way for efficient, biologically-inspired new AI hardware and algorithms.”

Yuval Meir, a PhD student and contributor to the work, added: “Highly pruned tree architectures represent a step toward a plausible biological realisation of efficient dendritic tree learning by a single or several neurons, with reduced complexity and energy consumption, and biological realization of backpropagation mechanism, which is currently the central technique in AI.”

Efficient dendritic tree learning is based on previous research by Kanter and his experimental research team – and conducted by Dr Roni Vardi – indicating evidence for sub-dendritic adaptation using neuronal cultures, together with other anisotropic properties of neurons, like different spike waveformsrefractory periods and maximal transmission rates.

The efficient implementation of highly pruned tree training requires a new type of hardware that differs from emerging GPUs which are better fitted to the current DL strategy. The emergence of a new hardware is required to efficiently imitate brain dynamics. 

The research is published in Scientific Reports.

Image: Schematic of a simple neural network based on dendritic tree (left) vs. a complex artificial intelligence deep learning architecture (right) © Professor Ido Kanter/ Bar-Ilan University.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Aether: Issue 3 Feb 2023

Aether: Issue 2 Nov 2022

Aether: Issue 1 Aug 2022

Subscribe for free

Latest Testimonial

What a beautiful motto: Discoveries must be read and not just published. When I was contacted by Aether as a new digital service to share scientific and technological insights I had my doubts that this was really going to be according to what I call the “open source & makers’ spirit”: knowledge should be free and it is there to be shared.

Well, Aether is faithful to its motto and shares discoveries freely. It has been a pleasure to collaborate for the interview and subsequent article. It has been greatly self satisfying to see how the interview was professionally and truthfully redacted and then published. Sharing thoughts and sparks for discussions is fundamental to the progress of society. Your journal offers clarity and brevity and I believe it provides the sparks to ignite any reader whether academic or not into action.

Dr Maria-Cristina Ciocci
Co-founder and Manager of non-profit organisation De Creative STEM,GirlsInSTEM