Strategic habitat restoration can generate a win-win situation for both forests and farmers, new research has found
The modelling study found that promoting pollinators’ habitat yields long-term conservation and economic benefits.
Carefully planned restoration of habitats in agricultural coffee landscapes can increase both farmers’ profit and forest cover over a 40-year period, according to new a study by Dr Sofía López-Cubillos at the University of Queensland in Australia, and colleagues.
Restoring patches of natural vegetation habitats in agricultural land presents a trade-off for farmers: while the lost cropland can reduce profitability, increases in ecosystem services like pollination can improve crop yield.
To investigate how conservation priorities can be balanced with economic needs, researchers developed a novel planning framework to model the effects of forest habitat restoration on agricultural profits, accounting for the beneficial effect of pollinators.
They considered the best spatial arrangement for restoring forests to achieve one of two goals – restoring forest while also expanding agriculture, or restoring forest only – and applied this to a case study of coffee farming in Costa Rica.
- Bee diversity improved by ‘flower strips’ on farms
- The number of the world’s farms to halve by 2100
- Changing temperatures increase pesticide risk to bees
- To tackle deforestation, we need to target agriculture
Restoration scenarios
They divided the study area into a grid of over 60,000 squares and estimated the current coffee yield, bee abundance, and profitability for each square.
Calculating coffee profits five years and 40 years into the future under a variety of restoration scenarios, they found that strategically allocating land to agriculture and forest could increase economic returns, compared to a baseline in which the current landscape was maintained.
Over a five-year period, prioritising habitat restoration was more profitable than strategies that simultaneously expanded agricultural land.
After 40 years, strategically balancing habitat conservation and agricultural profits could increase forest cover by 20% while doubling profits for landholders, even when accounting for agricultural land replaced by forest.
The study is the first to consider how long-term changes in pollinator abundance can influence the costs and benefits of restoring forest across agricultural landscapes.
The results show that with careful planning, pursuing conservation goals can improve economic outcomes for farmers, rather than being a burden, the authors say.
López-Cubillos added: “Bee abundance and the pollination services they provide can increase through restoration.
“This study explored the trade-offs between coffee profitability and forest restoration, finding that within five years profits increased by ~90% after restoration and forest restored area by 20%.”
The study is published in PLOS Biology.
Image: Wild bee pollinating coffee. Credit: Ganesh Subramaniam, Flickr (CC-BY 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/).
