Generations of global climate models have been affected by cloud and radiation biases, according to a new study
Clouds can cool or warm the planet’s surface, a radiative effect that contributes significantly to the global energy budget and can be altered by human-caused pollution. The world’s southernmost ocean, aptly named the Southern Ocean and far from human pollution but subject to abundant marine gases and aerosols, is about 80% covered by clouds. How does this body of water and relationship with clouds contribute to the world’s changing climate?
Researchers are still working to understand it. They’re now one step closer, thanks to an international collaboration identifying compensation errors in widely used climate model protocols known as CMIP6.
Yuan Wang, corresponding author and now an associate professor in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences at Purdue University, said: “Cloud and radiation biases over the Southern Ocean have been a long-lasting problem in the past generations of global climate models.
“After the latest CMIP6 models were released, we were anxious to see how they performed and whether the old problems were still there.”
CMIP6, a project of the World Climate Research Programme, allows for the systematic assessment of climate models to illuminate how they compare to each other and real-world data. In this study, Wang and the researchers analysed five of the CMIP6 models that aim to serve as standard references.
Wang said the researchers were also motivated by other studies in the field that point to the Southern Ocean’s cloud coverage as a contributing factor to some CMIP6 models’ high sensitivity, when the simulations predict a surface temperature that rises too quickly for the rate of increased radiation. In other words, if improperly simulated, the Southern Ocean clouds may cast a shadow of doubt on the projection of future climate change.
“This paper emphasises compensating errors in the cloud physical properties in spite of overall improvement of radiation simulation over the Southern Ocean,” Wang said. “With space satellite observations, we are able to quantify those errors in the simulated cloud microphysical properties, including cloud fraction, cloud water content, cloud droplet size and more, and further reveal how each contributes to the total bias in the cloud radiative effect.”
Large compensating biases
The cloud radiative effect – how clouds interfere with radiation to warm or cool the surface – is largely determined by the physical properties of the cloud.
Wang added: “Cloud radiative effects in CMIP6 are comparable with satellite observations, but we found there are large compensating biases in cloud fraction liquid water path and droplet effective radius.
“The major implication is that, even though the latest CMIP models improve the simulation of their mean states, such as radiation fluxes at the top of the atmosphere, the detailed cloud processes are still of large uncertainty.”
According to Wang, this discrepancy also partially explains why the model climate sensitivity assessments do not perform as well, since those assessments rely on model detailed physics – rather than the mean state performance – to evaluate the overall effect on the climate.
He said: “Our future work will aim to pin down individual parameterisations that are responsible for these biases. Hopefully, we can work closely with model developers to get them solved.
“After all, the ultimate goal of any model evaluation study is to help improve those models.”
The study is published in Advances in Atmospheric Sciences.
Image: The cloudy Southern Ocean shows an improved radiation budget in the latest IPCC climate models, but there are still significant biases in the simulated cloud physical properties over the SO. Those biases are largely cancelled out when they jointly influence the cloud radiative effect. The cloud image is captured by FY-3D satellite.
Credit: National Satellite Meteorological Center of China Meteorological Administration