How do you define shyness? Study analyses shyness in children

How do you define shyness? Study analyses shyness in children

A new study is seeking to add to our knowledge of behaviours by investigating how we define shyness through analysis of children

What is shyness? Research has shown that shyness is characterised by fear and nervousness in response to social novelty and/ or social evaluation.

Shyness can manifest on behavioural, affective, and physiological levels, but little is known about how these components cluster.

Longstanding theories note that shyness may be conceptualised as a trait that is relatively stable across development, which is described as temperamental shyness.

Shyness may also be conceptualised as an emotion that is felt in a certain social situation, which is described as ‘state shyness’.

To help better understand shyness in children, a new study by researchers at McMaster University in Canada examined a child’s behavioural, affective, and physiological responses to a speech task.

The findings showed that temperamental shyness may exist in a distinct group of children over time, while a larger subset of children may experience shyness as an emotional state in some situations.

Kristie Poole, who conducted the study at McMaster University and is now a Banting postdoctoral fellow at Brock University, said: “Our findings provide empirical support for the long-theorised idea that there may be a subset of temperamentally shy children who manifest heightened behavioural, affective, and physiological reactivity in response to a social stressor, as well as a subset of children who may experience only the affective component which may reflect state shyness.

“This highlights the multiple components and developmental course of temperamental shyness and the features that distinguish temperamental and state shyness in middle to late childhood.”





The current study included 152 Canadian children (73 girls) aged seven to eight, and their primary caregivers.

The children were born in a local hospital and were recruited from a child database at McMaster University containing birth records of infants whose parents consented to their infant’s inclusion.

Of the participating caregivers, 90% were mothers and 10% were fathers. Children were primarily white (81.6%), followed by mixed race (9.9%), Asian (3.9%), black (2.6%), and Latin American (2%). Children were primarily from middle to upper-socioeconomic-class families.

Children were fitted with an ambulatory electrocardiogram and completed activities with an experimenter in a room adjacent to their parent.

During this time, parents completed online questionnaires related to the child’s temperament while monitoring their child on a muted closed-circuit monitor.

Children prepared a two-minute speech about their last birthday and recited their speech in front of a video camera and mirror. They were told the speech would be videotaped for other children to watch later.

This was designed to induce stress. The study team coded children’s avoidance/ inhibition (i.e., behaviour), children self-reported their nervousness (i.e., affect), and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (i.e. physiology) was measured.

For their time, families were given $20 (~£11.80) gift cards and children received a Junior Scientist Certificate. At one- and two-year post evaluations, parents completed an online follow-up survey on their child’s temperament.

They responded to statements such as ‘child acts shy around new people’. This examined how a child’s responses to the speech were related to their temperament across time. Parents were given a $10 gift card at each follow-up.


Temperamentally shy


Poole said: “The findings showed that approximately 10% of children in our study showed social stress reactivity to the speech on behavioural, affective, and physiological levels, and also had a pattern of relatively higher, stable parent-reported temperamental shyness across time, providing evidence that they may be characterised as temperamentally shy.

“A second subset of approximately 25% of children showed a pattern of social stress reactivity only on an affective level (i.e., self-reported feeling nervous), and did not show relatively high levels of parent-reported temperamental shyness, providing evidence that they may be characterized by state shyness.

“The findings have implications for the conceptualisation of shyness in that different types of shyness may differ in kind rather than degree.”

The findings provide empirical evidence for long-standing ideas first articulated by the late Jerome Kagan several decades ago.

He argued that temperamental shyness may exist as a distinct category for some children and the features that define this category are relatively stable across time and context.

In addition to this subset of temperamentally shy children, researchers found that a larger subset of children may experience shyness as an emotional state in some situations.

It is likely that the experience of state shyness in response to a speech task is a relatively common, normative experience for children at this age.


Shyness as a risk factor


For a smaller group of temperamentally shy children, however, being the centre of attention may be stressful across time and various contexts.

Since we know that not all children are alike and early temperamental shyness is a risk factor for internalising-related problems, future work should examine the consequences of these findings for children’s social, psychological, and academic adjustment.

The authors acknowledge several limitations in their research. The study only measured behavioural, affective, and physiological components at one point in time, so they do not have the means to measure whether these components remain stable across development.

The authors recommend that future research include more diverse samples of children as this study was primarily of white children from middle to upper socioeconomic status families making it difficult to generalise the findings.

The study is published in Child Development.

Image:  There are not only old people in markets. Here’s one shy, sweet and a little bit curious girl from Ravangla market. © Sukanto Debnath (CC BY 2.0)

Research Aether / Humanity Uncovered

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Aether: Issue 4 May 2023

Aether: Issue 3 Feb 2023

Aether: Issue 2 Nov 2022

Aether: Issue 1 Aug 2022

Subscribe for free

Latest Testimonial

What a beautiful motto: Discoveries must be read and not just published. When I was contacted by Aether as a new digital service to share scientific and technological insights I had my doubts that this was really going to be according to what I call the “open source & makers’ spirit”: knowledge should be free and it is there to be shared.

Well, Aether is faithful to its motto and shares discoveries freely. It has been a pleasure to collaborate for the interview and subsequent article. It has been greatly self satisfying to see how the interview was professionally and truthfully redacted and then published. Sharing thoughts and sparks for discussions is fundamental to the progress of society. Your journal offers clarity and brevity and I believe it provides the sparks to ignite any reader whether academic or not into action.

Dr Maria-Cristina Ciocci
Co-founder and Manager of non-profit organisation De Creative STEM,GirlsInSTEM